<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline Institute&quot;Polluter Pays Principle&quot; Wins in Court - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2004/06/14/polluter_pays_p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2004/06/14/polluter_pays_p/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Polluter Pays Principle&quot; Wins in Court</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2004/06/14/polluter_pays_p/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian Supreme Court, ruling on a case between Canadian Forest Products and the province of British Columbia, has created an important precedent for sustainability. The court ruled that governments may sue polluters not only for the lost commercial value of environmental assets but also for broader damages to the public good. The Globe and Mail has a good summary here. My impression is that the United States has already...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
