<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteGet Local! - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2004/12/23/get_local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2004/12/23/get_local/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Get Local!</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2004/12/23/get_local/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Local stewardship of public lands a powerful idea. | The Bush Administration&#8217;s plan to put greater control of National Forests into the hands of local forest rangers is provoking cries of outrage from the environmental movement and Democrats, as reported in the New York Times, the Seattle Post Intelligencer, and the Bend Bulletin. I share the discontent but, unlike many of my mainstream environmental associates, I am attracted to one rather un-green reordering of public-lands governance. Just not this...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
