<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteOf Motion and Emotion - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/01/25/of_motion_and_e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/01/25/of_motion_and_e/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Of Motion and Emotion</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/01/25/of_motion_and_e/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Do SUV's aggressive ad campaigns explain their bad reputation? | I guess I touched a nerve: more people expressed an opinion about my posts on the Prius and the potential benefits of hybrid SUVs than about anything I&#8217;d written before. My question is:&nbsp; why?&nbsp; To recap:&nbsp; in the first post I argue that, for someone choosing between an inexpensive-but-pretty-efficient car and a super-efficient-but-more-expensive Prius, the cheaper car might be the more environmentally sound choice&#8212;as long as you&#8217;re willing to invest...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
