<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTunnel Vision? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/02/09/tunnel_vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/02/09/tunnel_vision/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Tunnel Vision?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/02/09/tunnel_vision/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A $4 billion tunnel?  In Seattle, that's $7,000 per resident. |  (This post is part of a series.) A while back, the Seattle city government decided that it wanted to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct&#8212;the seismically vulnerable aerial highway that cuts off the city&#8217;s downtown from its waterfront&#8212;with a tunnel. But what neither the city, nor anyone else, has decided is how to pay for the tunnel, which the state estimates could cost more than $4 billion. So far, the city...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
