<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteEverybody Loves Biofuels - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/02/everybody_loves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/02/everybody_loves/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Everybody Loves Biofuels</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/02/everybody_loves/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Urban-rural alliance supports biofuels. | Finally, something that both ends of the political spectrum can agree on:&nbsp; biofuels. This Oregonian article describes an alliance between a rural rightwinger and an urban lefty, both of whom have fallen for fuels made from grain and oilseeds.&nbsp; The rural legislator likes them because they boost farmers&#8217; income; the urban legislator likes them because they reduce fossil fuel consumption. I&#8217;ll leave my thoughts about food-based fuels for a later...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
