<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteFuels Rush In - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/fuels_rush_in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/fuels_rush_in/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Fuels Rush In</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/fuels_rush_in/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for a sober, hype-free look at biofuels. | This Eugene Register-Guard editorial&#8211;cautioning Oregon&#8217;s politicians to take a sober, hype-free look at biofuels before launching a program to subsidize them&#8212;is definitely worth reading.&nbsp; But it makes one point that, while not clearly out-and-out wrong, at least deserves a closer look.&nbsp; According to the editorial, legislative action to promote biofuels in Oregon would be unnecessary&#8230; &#8230;if biofuels could compete with other forms of energy in the marketplace. The fact that...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
