<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTo Cut Or Not To Cut? II - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/to_cut_or_not_t-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/to_cut_or_not_t-2/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>To Cut Or Not To Cut? II</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/03/17/to_cut_or_not_t-2/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The case for logging on public lands. | The Eugene Register-Guard continues its high-quality coverage of forest issues with today&#8217;s op-ed by Jeremy Hall of Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC). He makes the case that logging on federal land can be a good thing. ONRC wants chainsaws to stay out of roadless areas and old growth stands, but thinks they do belong in dense even-aged plantation stands where thinning may actually benefit forest ecosystems. ONRC&#8217;s position is far...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
