<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteA Tunnel of Money - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/01/a_tunnel_of_mon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/01/a_tunnel_of_mon/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Tunnel of Money</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/01/a_tunnel_of_mon/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Seattle raise $4 billion to replace a 2-mile highway? | &nbsp; (This post is part of a series.) For a couple years now I&#8217;ve been obsessed, on and off, with the fate of the Alaskan Way Viaduct:  its history (Seattle&#8217;s first major urban highway), its present (a seismically unstable eyesore that cuts off development options on Seattle&#8217;s downtown waterfront), and its future (still a conundrum&#8212;the city and the state want to replace it with a $4 billion tunnel, but nobody...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
