<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteYoung Is The New Old - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/18/young_is_the_ne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/18/young_is_the_ne/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Young Is The New Old</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/04/18/young_is_the_ne/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[I s Oregon's supply of old-growth forests really growing? | Are old growth forests growing back? According to an article in the Oregonian, new federal research shows that there are 600,000 more acres of old forest west of the Cascades than there were a decade ago. I&#8217;m suspicious. The structural characteristics of old growth forests are enormously complex. It&#8217;s a lot more than just a few trees with thick trunks. Though there are many competing definitions of old growth, foresters...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
