<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteBurnt CAFE - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/05/11/burnt_cafe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/05/11/burnt_cafe/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Burnt CAFE</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/05/11/burnt_cafe/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuel efficient cars have an unexpected downside. | It&#8217;s a rare treat to read a dry, technical report and&#8212;almost by accident&#8212;learn something surprising, counterintuitive, useful and (at least to me) genuinely new.&nbsp; Which is exactly what happened when I read this paper (beware, pdf) by Todd Litman at the Victoria Transportation Policy Institute.&nbsp; The upshot:&nbsp; raising vehicle fuel-economy standards, which always seemed to me like a good idea, may actually be counterproductive, even if they&#8217;re truly successful at...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
