<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteDensity We Can Afford - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/08/density_we_can_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/08/density_we_can_/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Density We Can Afford</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/08/density_we_can_/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Apropos of Clark&#8217;s density posts. I thought I&#8217;d try a new tack. It&#8217;s a risky one, because I&#8217;m disagreeing with my boss. Sort of. First, I agree with Clark, that supply-side housing policy (increasing density) keeps city housing more affordable than it otherwise would be. But I also believe (with Sheldon Cooper) that market-based mechanisms cannot meet the housing needs of lower- and middle-income people because the market is structurally...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
