<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteGlobal Warming or Genetic Warming? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/15/global_warming_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/15/global_warming_/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Global Warming or Genetic Warming?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/06/15/global_warming_/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A renewed discussion on nuclear energy. | Because of growing concern about the effects of global climate change, nuclear energy seems to be gaining a new lease on life. Of particular note: some enviros have switched sides and now support, at least in principle, moving toward more nuclear power. (See Alan Durning&#8217;s most recent remarks on the viability of nuclear power here). Today&#8217;s news from Hanford provides some counterpoint. The Seattle P-I reports on a new study...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
