<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteDead End For Viaduct? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/09/19/dead_end_for_vi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/09/19/dead_end_for_vi/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Dead End For Viaduct?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/09/19/dead_end_for_vi/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-gas tax inititiative could doom Seattle's waterfront tunnel. | (This post is part of a series.) Headline from the Seattle Times:  Remove the viaduct even if state can&#8217;t rebuild it? Apparently, Seattle city officials are increasingly willing to say that, if the state&#8217;s gas tax hike is repealed this November (as looks increasingly likely), the Alaskan Way Viaduct along Seattle&#8217;s downtown waterfront should simply be torn down.  The existing structure poses a safety hazard, and without the $2 billion...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
