<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteMeasure 37: Down, But Probably Not Out - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/17/measure_37__dow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/17/measure_37__dow/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Measure 37:  Down, But Probably Not Out</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/17/measure_37__dow/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[This is big news:&nbsp; last Friday, a judge in Oregon&nbsp; ruled that Measure 37 violates the state constitution. To recap:&nbsp; Measure 37, which was approved overwhelmingly by Oregon voters last fall, required state or local governments either to compensate landowners, or to waive development restrictions, whenever land-use rules reduced the value of private property.&nbsp; The measure was strongly supported by timber interests, who faced limits on logging near streams and...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
