<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCanada Questions Feebates - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/25/canada_question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/25/canada_question/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Canada Questions Feebates</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/25/canada_question/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Feebates set back in Canada for now. | We&#8217;re a little late on this bit of depressing news. A report issued last week by Canada&#8217;s National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy recommended against implementing feebates, one of the most promising market tools around for encouraging the purchase of energy-efficient products and for tugging the entire car and truck market toward better fuel efficiency. (The NRTEE was charged with studying feebate options after the idea was...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
