<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteFSC for the Feds? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/31/fsc_for_the_fed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/31/fsc_for_the_fed/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>FSC for the Feds?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/10/31/fsc_for_the_fed/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Forest Service is finally going to look into the merits of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification for a small number of forests, including the Fremont National Forest in southern Oregon. Continued cutting on federal land, even under FSC standards, is not exactly popular with many conservationists. But the reality nowadays is that federal-land logging is likely to increase because of the Healthy Forests Initiative and, especially, slick new...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
