<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteA Grizzly Discussion - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2005/12/22/a_grizzly_discu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2005/12/22/a_grizzly_discu/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Grizzly Discussion</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2005/12/22/a_grizzly_discu/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Update to the no-hunting vs. ecosystem restoration debate. | A few days ago, I posted on Raincoast&#8217;s buyout of guide-outfitter hunting rights in coastal BC. The upshot is that I questioned whether the buyout was the wisest possible use of conservation dollars and postulated that conservation investments can benefit from rigorous accounting. As blog posts are wont to do, it circulated around the web where it attracted a variety of feedback&#8212;thoughtful rebuttals and inquiries, incoherent ranting, and a fairly...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
