<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteImminent Eminent Domain Reform? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/11/imminent-eminent-domain-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/11/imminent-eminent-domain-reform/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Imminent Eminent Domain Reform?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/11/imminent-eminent-domain-reform/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A few property law fixes in Washington. | It looks like the Washington legislature is going to take up eminent domain soon. According to editorial coverge in the P-I: A bill this legislative session should require general public notification (beyond Web-based meeting dockets) of condemnation decisions and direct notification of landowners by any government considering using eminent domain to acquire property. Openness is vital. That sounds like an unalloyed good to me. There&#8217;s also movement afoot to go...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
