<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWashington: The West Coast Hold-out? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/26/washington-the-west-coast-hold-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/26/washington-the-west-coast-hold-out/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Washington: The West Coast Hold-out?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/01/26/washington-the-west-coast-hold-out/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the Evergreen State join the cap-and-trade club? | To date, Washington has been the weakest link in&nbsp;a potentially giant West Coast cap and trade market for greenhouse gases. This is odd. And annoying.&nbsp;But it could be about to change. So far, the clear frontrunner has been California, under the&nbsp;leadership of a Republican.&nbsp;Recently there&#8217;s been talk in British Columbia, under its center-right premier,&nbsp;of drafting a California-style system. And earlier this week, we heard word that Oregon&#8217;s governor was considering...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
