<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteHandicapping West Coast Climate Policies - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/02/13/handicapping-west-coast-climate-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/02/13/handicapping-west-coast-climate-policies/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Handicapping West Coast Climate Policies</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/02/13/handicapping-west-coast-climate-policies/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Keeping score on state climate legislation. | A few weeks ago, I mentioned that Washington was the West Coast&#8217;s weakest link when it comes to climate policy. Since then, the Evergreen state has stepped up with the outline of a plan to put a sizeable dent in emissions. (That&#8217;s in addition to some small-caliber but near-term policies). This was such great news that I was tempted to change my handicapping. But then I read the papers yesterday&#8230;...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
