<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Bridge and Tunnel Crowd - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/13/the-bridge-and-tunnel-crowd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/13/the-bridge-and-tunnel-crowd/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Bridge and Tunnel Crowd</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/13/the-bridge-and-tunnel-crowd/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What's fair and what's not? And who knows? | Even by the weird and hysterical standards of Seattle&#8217;s great viaduct debate, something very strange is going on. The weirdness has got to do with what I&#8217;ll call the &#8220;equity argument&#8221; &#8212; that our treatment of the viaduct should not discriminate against workers. Good. Fair enough. No doubt most of us agree: voters and policymakers should be attentive to ordinary- and lower-income folks when making decisions. But what&#8217;s strange is this: according to the...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
