<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteA Real No-No - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/14/a-real-no-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/14/a-real-no-no/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Real No-No</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/03/14/a-real-no-no/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Seattle voters reject a waterfront highway.  What's next? | If you live in Seattle, you may have noticed a little thing about some sort of vote&#8230;oh, what was it now&#8230;oh, that&#8217;s right, the Viaduct. City voters decided that they wantedno part of a new waterfront highway.  No tunnel, no elevated.  Period. Of course, this was just an advisory vote, and the whole election was pretty widely portrayed as a meaningless exercise. Legally, our elected officials are still free to...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
