<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteDoes No-No Mean No? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/04/12/does-no-no-mean-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/04/12/does-no-no-mean-no/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Does No-No Mean No?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/04/12/does-no-no-mean-no/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The Viaduct vote shows that hard-core pro-highway voters are in the minority. | It&#8217;s been nearly a month since Seattle voters rejected both of the officially sanctioned options for replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct. The final tally: 70 percent of voters opted against the tunnel; and 57 percent voted against rebuilding a new &amp; bigger elevated freeway. As far as such things go, it was a landslide&#8212;a resounding &#8220;no&#8221; to both options. But does that end the controversy? Probably not. You see, it...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
