<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTax Flattery - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/29/tax-flattery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/29/tax-flattery/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Tax Flattery</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/29/tax-flattery/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Not in our bioregion, but interesting anyway: the L.A. Timesopines that carbon taxes would work better than a cap-and-trade system: A carbon tax simply imposes a taxfor polluting based on the amount emitted, thus encouraging polluters to clean up and entrepreneurs to come up with alternatives. The taxis constant and predictable. It doesn&#8217;t require the creation of a new energy trading market, and it can be collected by existing state...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
