<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Real Cost of Property Regulation - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/31/the-real-cost-of-property-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/31/the-real-cost-of-property-regulation/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Real Cost of Property Regulation</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/05/31/the-real-cost-of-property-regulation/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 6/5/07: A couple of changes made to the orginal post. When Measure 37 was up for a vote in 2004, supporters claimed that Oregon&#8217;s planning laws were so draconian that they reduced property values by $5.4 billion per year. That eye-popping figure may be one of the central reasons why voters were inclined to support the measure. (Voter support has since severelyevaporated.) As it turns out, however, that $5.4 billion...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
