<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteOregon&#039;s Property Values Still Not Hurt By Planning - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/06/08/oregon-s-property-values-still-not-hurt-by-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/06/08/oregon-s-property-values-still-not-hurt-by-planning/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Oregon&#8217;s Property Values Still Not Hurt By Planning</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/06/08/oregon-s-property-values-still-not-hurt-by-planning/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE 6/8/07: Changes made throughout this post. Last week I wrote about a study showing that, in aggregate, Oregon&#8217;s property values were not hurt by the state&#8217;s smart growth laws. Ergo, Measure 37 &#8220;fixed&#8221; something that wasn&#8217;t broken. Turns out that study was based on data collected and analyzed by two researchers at Oregon State University. Those researchers, William Jaeger and Andrew Plantinga, have produced a more complete report (pdf) containing a full economic...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
