<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstitutePBDEs: Boeing, Going, Gone... - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/08/16/pbdes-boeing-going-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/08/16/pbdes-boeing-going-gone/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>PBDEs:  Boeing, Going, Gone&#8230;</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/08/16/pbdes-boeing-going-gone/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Aerospace giant finds alternative to toxic flame retardant. | Apparently, Boeing was a bit of a sticking point in the negotiations over Washington&#8217;s recent ban of the toxic flame retardants known as PBDEs. In legislative negotions, the ariplane manufacturer won an exemption for one form of PBDE, arguing that there were no safe, effective alternatives for some aviation applications. All things considered, that exemption may have made some sense. The PBDE ban was definitely a good idea; but it&#8217;s...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
