<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteClimate Pricing Uncertainty Principle - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/13/climate-pricing-uncertainty-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/13/climate-pricing-uncertainty-principle/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Climate Pricing Uncertainty Principle</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/13/climate-pricing-uncertainty-principle/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Economics vs. politics doesn't explain the carbon cap vs. tax debate. | I&#8217;m not sure that this Wall Street Journal article gets the &#8220;carbon tax&#8221; vs. &#8220;cap and trade&#8221; debate quite right. It portrays the dispute as a split between politicians and economists: Many academics, even conservatives, favor a tax on carbon emissions. Many lawmakers, including some liberals, fear a political backlash against new fees. They lean toward a cap-and-trade system, which would set a limit on carbon-dioxide emissions and require companies...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
