<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstitutePaper vs. Plastic-The Final Analysis - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/19/it-s-in-the-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/19/it-s-in-the-bag/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Paper vs. Plastic&#8212;The Final Analysis</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/09/19/it-s-in-the-bag/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate is over, and the loser is...meat! | [Alas, this is super-intern Justin Brant&#8217;s swan song&#8212;his last Daily Score post before he moves on to bigger and better things&#8230;] Reader Jonathan Shakes came up with a great idea in response to Clark&#8217;s blog post on the absurdity of the paper-vs-plastic debate. Says Shakes: &#8220;I&#8217;d love to see an illustration from one of the data geeks just why the bag contents matter more than the bag itself.&#8221; Well Jonathan,...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
