<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTrain Tracking Poll - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/11/29/train-tracking-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/11/29/train-tracking-poll/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Train Tracking Poll</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/11/29/train-tracking-poll/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Puget Sound wanted transit, not roads. | We&#8217;vearguedbefore that one of the surprising reasons why Puget Sound&#8217;s roads-and-transit package failed was that voters were concerned about climate emissions. Today, there&#8217;s new polling data that buttresses our claim. The poll finds that 20 percent of &#8220;no&#8221;-voters cited global warming as a reason for opposing the measure. This is an astonishing figure&#8212;one I believe that&#8217;s totally unprecedented, anywhere. (Someone please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong!) Below, I&#8217;ve cherry-picked a...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
