<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCarbon Taxes: The Good and The Bad - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/04/carbon-taxes-the-good-and-the-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/04/carbon-taxes-the-good-and-the-bad/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Taxes: The Good and The Bad</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/04/carbon-taxes-the-good-and-the-bad/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Simplicity's important---but it shouldn't trump effectiveness. | Last week&#8217;s Washington Post carried an interesting op-ed that argued for a carbon tax. The nut graph: The only effective way to begin reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slow global climate change is to make it more expensive to emit carbon dioxide. Unless businesses and consumers pay a price for carbon dioxide, neither will make the investments in technology and changes in energy use needed to dramatically reduce emissions. Well...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
