<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCap and Trading - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/12/cap-and-trading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/12/cap-and-trading/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Cap and Trading</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2007/12/12/cap-and-trading/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[More evidence that grandfathering carbon permits = windfall profits. | This one sentence from a US Congressional Budget Office report on the economics of a carbon cap says an awful lot: [O]ne study suggested that if emissions were reduced by 23 percent and all of the allowances were distributed for free to producers in the oil, natural gas, and coal sectors, stock values would double for oil and gas producers and increase more than sevenfold for coal producers, compared with...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
