<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWhat&#039;s Right with the WCI? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/10/whats-right-with-the-wci/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/10/whats-right-with-the-wci/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>What&#039;s Right with the WCI?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/10/whats-right-with-the-wci/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[On electricity, a new climate proposal has a lot going for it. | Last week, Eric dinged the WCI&#8212;a multi-jurisdictional effort to design a market for curbing climate-warming emissions&#8212;for kicking the can down the road on transportation fuels. Of course, the WCI has NOT ruled out the possibility of capping emissions from the transportation sector.&nbsp; They&#8217;ve just delayed a decision until they run some more economic analysis.&nbsp; So there&#8217;s no reason to gnash our teeth&#8212;not yet, anyway&#8212;over a lost opportunity.&nbsp; Still, it&#8217;s hard...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
