<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWindfalls - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/25/windfalls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/25/windfalls/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Windfalls</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/03/25/windfalls/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why consumer protection means selling carbon permits. | One of the thorniest problems in cap and trade programs is deciding how to distribute the carbon permits. Should the public sell pollution privileges or give them away for free? Some folks worry&nbsp;that if we make polluters pay for carbon permits, they&#8217;ll just raise prices for consumers. That&#8217;s a perfectly legitimate concern. But unfortunately,&nbsp;it turns out to be true whether or not we sell the permits or give them away...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
