<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTrouble for Clean Cars? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/01/clean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/01/clean/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Trouble for Clean Cars?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/01/clean/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why we can't count on complementary carbon polices. | This is&nbsp;why I worry&nbsp;about using complementary policies to reduce carbon emisisons, rather than a firm and declining cap on transportation fuels. Take California&#8217;s &#8220;clean car standards&#8221;&#8212;a first rate policy if there ever was one.* As CNN reports, it isn&#8217;t working out as planned: California regulators have drastically cut the number of zero-emission vehicles required to be sold in the state by the year 2014, a decision that frustrated environmentalists but...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
