<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteVehicle Miles Unraveled - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/24/vehicle-miles-unraveled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/24/vehicle-miles-unraveled/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle Miles Unraveled</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/04/24/vehicle-miles-unraveled/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting clear on per capita VMT reductions. | ***Update 4/24, 4:00 p.m.:The original version of this post was wrong. ***Update 4/30: I wrote a very important&nbsp;addendumto this post. There&#8217;s a lot of confusion about the VMT provision in Washington&#8217;s new &#8220;Climate Action and Green Jobs&#8221; legislation (HB 2815). That&#8217;s to be expected because that section of&nbsp;the bill is rather confusing. It calls for reducing per capita vehicle miles traveled. But reduce them from what level? And, is that...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
