<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteBusinesses: Cap Transportation - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/05/07/wci-and-big-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/05/07/wci-and-big-oil/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Businesses: Cap Transportation</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/05/07/wci-and-big-oil/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[WCI's transportation fuels: not dead yet. | One of the biggest sticking points in the Western Climate Initiative (WCI)&nbsp;has been the question of &#8220;Scope&#8221;&#8212;which emissions get&nbsp;included in the cap and trade program. Most public interest organizations argue for a broad cap that includes all the&nbsp;major sources of emissions&nbsp;that can be reliably measured and regulated. (Sightline&#8217;s argued this here, here, here, and here.) And the biggest source of emssions, of course&#8212;the biggest by far&#8212;is transportation fuel. Somewhat surprisingly,...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
