<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Vanity of Bonfire Bans - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/09/the-vanity-of-bonfire-bans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/09/the-vanity-of-bonfire-bans/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Vanity of Bonfire Bans</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/09/the-vanity-of-bonfire-bans/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[On the climate impacts of beach fires. | I&#8217;m sort of piling on at this point, but I can&#8217;t help myself. Last week, the Seattle Parks Department set off a small firestorm when they announced a possible ban on beach bonfires. For whatever reason, the press ran the story as a global warming policy. (I&#8217;m told that Parks marshalled a number of reasons for the potential ban, only one of which was that bonfires contribute to global warming.) The...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
