<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Political Chances of Carbon Taxes - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/13/the-political-chances-of-carbon-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/13/the-political-chances-of-carbon-taxes/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Political Chances of Carbon Taxes</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/06/13/the-political-chances-of-carbon-taxes/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Who you callin' a tax, buddy? | There&#8217;s an ecumenical rift in the carbon policy world. Some favor taxes, while others prefer cap and trade. I&#8217;m in the later camp, though I&#8217;m sort of a carbon Unitarian: I like carbon taxes too. From a policy perspective, they fit together nicely. Among the reasons&nbsp;I&#8217;m on the c&amp;t side is that taxes&nbsp;can&nbsp;be radioactive, at least in US politics. Now, this isn&#8217;t really a substantive objection to carbon taxes as...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
