<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteHot Water - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/21/hot-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/21/hot-water/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Hot Water</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/21/hot-water/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[For climate impact, bottled water has a drinking problem. | The great thing about&nbsp; this Swiss study on tap water vs. bottled water is that it takes a boring, commonsense intuition, and makes it interesting&#8212;just by providing a few numbers. In this case, the intuition is that bottled water uses more energy&#8212;and thus releases more greenhouse gases&#8212;than plain old tap water.&nbsp; The point is really obvious:&nbsp; just think about the energy that&#8217;s required to manufacture bottles, and you can pretty...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
