<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteA Deeply Irresponsible Article - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/24/a-deeply-irresponsible-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/24/a-deeply-irresponsible-article/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Deeply Irresponsible Article</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/07/24/a-deeply-irresponsible-article/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oregonian misfires with a badly-argued op-ed. | I&#8217;m not going to pull punches:&nbsp; The Oregonian ran an opinion piece on climate science, penned by columnist David Reinhard, that simply isn&#8217;t up to the standards of responsible journalism.&nbsp; Not only does it get basic facts wrong, it displays a disturbing arrogance, coming from someone who&#8217;s arguing that others should display a little humility. The Oregonian&#8216;s readers deserve better.&nbsp; At risk of giving the article more attention than it...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
