<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTwo Views of Greenhouse Gases - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/11/two-views-of-greenhouse-gases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/11/two-views-of-greenhouse-gases/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Two Views of Greenhouse Gases</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/11/two-views-of-greenhouse-gases/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The same data yields two very different pictures of what's important. | Behold:&nbsp; two very different ways of looking at U.S. climate-warming emissions, thanks to the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (pdf presentation here).&nbsp; First, the geeky view, with emissions broken out by the specific activities and economic sectors that directly account for emissions: In this view,&nbsp; electricity and transportation dominate&#8212;suggesting that those are pretty good places to look for emissions reductions. But here&#8217;s another, somewhat more personal view&#8212;one that fits our...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
