<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteInside WCI: Biomass - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/12/inside-wci-biomass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/12/inside-wci-biomass/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Inside WCI: Biomass</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/08/12/inside-wci-biomass/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why treat all forms of carbon emissions alike? | This is the seventh in a short series of posts that explain some important but often overlooked policy issues in the Western Climate Initiative&#8212;the West&#8217;s regional cap-and-trade system. &nbsp; Earlier in this series, I&#8217;ve worried that WCI is waiting too long to include some major sources of climate pollution in their program. But worse, they are also proposing to completely ignore some sources of emissions. Early on, the latest draft contains this...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
