<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCap and Trade Comparison - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/cap-and-trade-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/cap-and-trade-comparison/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Cap and Trade Comparison</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/cap-and-trade-comparison/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[How federal US climate policies stack up. | Finally, it&#8217;s all in one place. World Resources Institute just released a fabulous little summary that compares all the federal US cap and trade proposals. It&#8217;s chock full of helpful (if slightly wonkish) graphics and tables, like this one: The summary deals only with questions of &#8220;scope&#8221;&#8212;which sectors of the economy are capped&#8212;and the reduction schedules in each policy. There&#8217;s no comparison of auctioning regimes or offsets or other market...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
