<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Politics of Plastic - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/the-politics-of-plastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/the-politics-of-plastic/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Politics of Plastic</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/09/12/the-politics-of-plastic/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Seattle's bag fee goes to the ballot. | Starting next year, Seattle will have a new 20 cent fee on grocery sacks. Portland is thinking about following suit. So is&nbsp;the Vancouver, BC region. But as the Seattle P-Ireported this morning, the American Chemistry Council (aka the plastics industry) has spent more than $180,000 to put Seattle&#8217;s measure before voters. Clearly, they want to kill these bag fees before they spread. So much so, in fact, that they dropped...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
