<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteMeasure 63&#039;s Last Gasp - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/10/28/measure-63s-last-gasp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/10/28/measure-63s-last-gasp/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Measure 63&#8217;s Last Gasp</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/10/28/measure-63s-last-gasp/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[After the election, a way forward for Oregon land use law? | With just a week to go before the election I don&#8217;t have much to add to the defeaning chorus of &#8220;No on Measure 63&#8221; editorials from Oregon&#8217;s newspapers. (I could be mistaken, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s been even a single &#8220;yes&#8221; editorial in the state.) But let&#8217;s take a look at what newspapers are saying. First, my favorite (for selfish reasons), the Oregonian gives it a thumbs down while...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
