<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteShould Cruise Ships Pay For Puget Sound? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2008/11/18/should-cruise-ships-pay-for-puget-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2008/11/18/should-cruise-ships-pay-for-puget-sound/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Should Cruise Ships Pay For Puget Sound?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2008/11/18/should-cruise-ships-pay-for-puget-sound/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Alaska shows the way on managing the cruise industry. | Update: A version of this post appeared in Real Change News. Let&#8217;s say, just hypothetically, that Washington were facing a ginormous budget shortfall. And let&#8217;s also say that the state had made an ambitious &#8212;&nbsp;but mostly unfunded&#8212;commitment to cleaning up Puget Sound. That would be a real pickle. But do you know what I&#8217;d do? I&#8217;d levy a tax on the cruise industry, that&#8217;s what. Washington&#8217;s cruise ships are only...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
