<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteAnd the Second Greenest City Is... - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/01/11/and-the-second-greenest-city-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/01/11/and-the-second-greenest-city-is/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>And the Second Greenest City Is&#8230;</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/01/11/and-the-second-greenest-city-is/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The winner is no surprise, but who's second? | On January 4, Seattle inaugurated a new, ultra-green mayor, which got me thinking comparatively. Which of the three largest Cascadian cities is the greenest? Not in plans and intentions and declarations but in facts? I recently pored over data from the Cascadia Scorecard and other sources. The answer? No contest: Vancouver, BC. It&#8217;s not so much Vancouver&#8217;s new rail transit line under downtown that goes to the airport (which Seattle...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
