<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteGovernment Mind Control - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/17/government-mind-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/17/government-mind-control/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Government Mind Control</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/17/government-mind-control/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Is behavorial science better than economics? | Over at Grist, Dave Roberts has a fascinating interview with congressman Brian Baird, who hails from southwest Washington. Baird argues, basically, that behavioral science is often better context than economics for thinking about climate and energy policy. An excerpt: Science offers ways of figuring out how to help people understand and adapt to new technologies&#8230; nobody designs a fighter plane or a spaceship or a nuclear power plant without human factors engineering. You can&#8217;t...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
