<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCliff Notes on Climate Science - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/29/cliff-notes-on-climate-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/29/cliff-notes-on-climate-science/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Cliff Notes on Climate Science</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/03/29/cliff-notes-on-climate-science/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do skeptics see climate science as a house of cards? | For your reading pleasure:&nbsp; The Economisthas published the best short summary of climate science I&#8217;ve run across in ages, touching on everything from thermodynamics to the psychology of climate change skepticism.&nbsp; This description of how climate scientists differ from climate skeptics in how they think about science struck me as particularly insightful: You might say that some see a jigsaw where others see a house of cards. Jigsaw types have...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
